Thanx idoru za tole. Resda igrano, ampak v principu ilustrira mojo domnevo, da je poliamorija samo lejm soušal ekspiriment na področju intimnih odnosov, kakor je bil komunizem na družbenem.
Sem hotela pokomentirati tole, ampak v bistvu se lahko samo podpišem pod prispevek od s_ilverstone. Obenem z nekaj komentarji pod samim videom:
a lot of ppl can't even find one partner whom they could trust; and you talking about having many
Want to learn to love? Start with plants, then animals, then, when you have achieved competence find another person to love.
Polyamory without total honesty is pure madness.
Do whatever makes you happy. But for Christ's sakes, give your partner a heads up before you assume they're on board with this. For example, if someone tells you before you have a relationship with them that they are definitely monogamous, maybe don't agree to be in a monogamous relationship with them.... only to wait until they've invested a year, and inform them that they need to be cool if you fall in love with someone else.If you want to be polyamorous, be with polyamorous people. I think that's really mature and really beautiful. Also really mature and really beautiful, monogamy for people who are monogamous in nature. Not fucking with people who are monogamous and insisting they need to change. Fuck on your own side of the fence. Be okay with that.
This is the proper conclusion. However, it could have done without the footnote of condemnation. Monogamy is not a sign of weakness or insecurity. Everything in life is not a family sized bag of chips to be passed around. Sharing is contextual. Drug addicts sharing needles isn't the picture of selfless love. I don't believe in intellectualizing love. Let it be it's own thing. That is not to say that love does not have it's own internal logic. We all resent the traveling salesmen of a lover fathering children in every state. Possessive love is conducive to family cohesion.